Texas lawmakers move to close foster care hiring loopholes and expand rights of parents facing investigations

Parents often go through child abuse investigations without legal support and with little understanding of their legal rights. Lawmakers prioritized increasing their due-process protections this session.

Much like police are required to read a Miranda warning, House Bill 730 would require caseworkers to notify parents of their rights at the start of an investigation. Parents would be reminded they can have a lawyer present and they do not have to let investigators interview them or their children.

Should a parent refuse to be interviewed by an investigator or deny the investigator entry to their home, the caseworker can ask a judge for a court order. HB 730 would also require DFPS to show probable cause, which requires more evidence than the current standard, to get that court order.

“There is a real lack of due process in the CPS arena, I believe. And I think a lot of my colleagues agree,” said state Rep. James Frank, R-Wichita Falls, the author of HB 730. “A parent should understand what is at risk and that we’re doing an investigation and that they have rights.”

The state Legislature also approved Senate Bill 614, authored by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, which would require DFPS to notify parents about their right to speak with an attorney if caseworkers are looking to temporarily place a child outside their home.

Wu tried to shepherd House Bill 1990, which would have required DFPS to notify a child’s parent when the agency makes changes to the written report about the child abuse investigation. But time ran out for HB 1990 to become law. The Texas House approved the bill on May 11, but it sat pending in a Senate committee until the end of the session.

Lawmakers focused on how CPS investigations are kick off.

House Bill 63, authored by Rep. Valoree Swanson, R-Spring, would end anonymous reporting of child abuse or neglect. The bill would require DFPS to obtain the caller’s identity, though all reports would be confidential. The bill headed to Abbott on May 18 — but not without pushback. Nearly 80% of reports of child abuse or neglect are unfounded and many of those reports start with anonymous calls.

Sen. José Menéndez, D-San Antonio, raised concerns that an end to anonymous reporting would keep people from calling in reports of abuse.

“None of us in this room want any child to suffer abuse or neglect. And I would hate for us to vote for a policy where the tradeoff is ... [having] a child possibly die from abuse or neglect,” Menéndez said on the Senate floor.

More than a year after a Bastrop foster care facility hired a caretaker with a history of misconduct against children, lawmakers closed employment loopholes to better identify bad actors.

When the caretaker was accused of selling and soliciting nude photos of two girls in her care at The Refuge, The Texas Tribune identified that a state juvenile facility had previously fired the caretaker for having inappropriate relationships with children in her care.

Senate Bill 1849 creates an interagency reportable conduct search engine that DFPS could use to conduct background checks. The bill got approval from the Senate on May 19 and is now headed to Abbott.

Another related bill, authored by Rep. John Lujan, R-San Antonio, would have established a central registry of the names of individuals found by the Health and Human Services Commission or the Texas Juvenile Justice Department to have abused or neglected a child. House Bill 2572 passed the House on May 4 but never made it out of a Senate committee.

The Refuge staff also concealed evidence of the abuse, which allowed the abuse to persist, lawmakers learned at an interim hearing about the facility in 2022. While mandatory reporting requirements exist for professionals licensed by the state, such as teachers and day care employees, they do not extend to staff at DFPS and TJJD facilities who are not licensed by the state, which was the case for the caretaker at The Refuge.

Senate Bill 182, which passed both chambers, amends the state’s human resources code to require employees and contractors of DFPS and TJJD to report criminal offenses committed by fellow employees and contractors to the Texas Department of Public Safety.

Children who have been removed from their homes experience less trauma when placed in the care of relatives, also known as kinship care. But relative caregivers get roughly half of the compensation of strangers who take in children.

Lawmakers filed several bills to increase pay for relative caregivers with state funds this session. Those bills died when the clock ran out this session.

In Texas, relatives receive $12.67 per day, per child for up to 12 months if their total household income is below 300% of the federal poverty limit. Foster parents receive at least $27.07 per day but can get paid more if a child has more complex needs. Foster parents are required to go through training and get licensed before they take in a child, unlike relative caregivers. Relatives can go through the training and get “verified” to get paid the same as foster parents, but grandparents say the verification process comes with a lot of red tape.

Rep. Terry Meza, D-Irving, authored House Bill 1431, which would have removed the income limits that disqualify relative caregivers making 300% above the federal poverty limit from getting state assistance.

Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins, D-San Antonio, filed House Bill 4159, which would have ended the requirement that a relative caregiver to get “verified” to access the same payments as foster parents. HB 4159 would also have allowed a relative caregiver to get paid if they still were providing for the child after 12 months.

Senate Bill 908, authored by Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, would also have allowed relative caregivers to receive the same payments as foster parents without having to get “verified.” Rep. Lacey Hull, R-Houston, authored the identical House Bill 2613.

Those bills did not get enough traction to move out of their respective House committees, even though they had the backing of key child welfare groups.

Lawmakers did add a budget amendment that provides a pathway for relative caregivers to get more payments.

The Biden administration in February proposed formalizing federal recommendations that would let local child welfare agencies ease licensing standards.

In the state’s final budget, they directed the state to “develop and adopt different licensing rules or approval standards for relative or kinship foster family homes with the intent to facilitate more relative or kinship homes in qualifying for full foster care payments.” If the state aligns with federal regulations, the agency would get access to matching federal dollars.

The Legislature last increased payments for relatives in 2017, but relatives say the increase wasn’t enough.

“More grandparents would stand up and take their grandchildren if there wasn’t so much red tape, and we got more financial support than what they’re giving us,” said Shirley Harris, who has been raising her granddaughter. “Even though we’re not trained like the licensed foster parents are, we have relationships with our grandchildren.”

Perhaps the most direct response to the long-running federal lawsuit against the state is a bill addressing caseload limits and long wait times on the abuse hotline. But that bill saw little movement this session, and met its demise when it missed a procedural deadline on May 20.

Court monitors in January said response times for Statewide Intake, the hotline to report child abuse or neglect, increased by half a minute over the past year. Callers to the state hotline wait on hold an average of 5.2 minutes. And between July 2021 and June 2022, SWI hotline staff abandoned 22% of calls.

State Rep. Armando Walle’s House Bill 2359 would have required the agency to swiftly respond to calls made to the hotline. Under HB 2359, the average hold time for calls to the hotline could not exceed five minutes, and the call abandonment rate for each state fiscal year cannot exceed 25%.

The Houston Democrat’s bill would have also instituted caseload limits for DFPS staff. High caseloads have been central to the federal lawsuit since it was first filed in 2011. At the time of filing, one of the major complaints was that caseworkers were carrying more than double the standard for caseload limits.

Under HB 2359, caseworkers conducting CPS investigations would be limited to an average of 15 cases; CPS caseworkers working to keep a child safely in their home would be limited to 10 cases; other CPS caseworkers would be limited to 20 cases.

The limits go beyond caseworkers. Child care licensing inspectors would be limited to 64 nonresidential facilities or family homes; child care licensing investigators would be limited to 17 day cares; while Adult Protective Services specialists would be limited to 22 cases.

The bill sat pending for months in the House Human Services Committee after members heard testimony on March 21. It had to advance past the committee phase by May 20.

The state Legislature set aside at least $97.1 million in the budget to expand community-based care, a model adopted in 2017 that aims to keep foster children closer to their homes.

Under the model, DFPS outsources agency responsibilities by contracting third parties in more than 11 designated DFPS districts. These third parties would be responsible for placing kids in foster homes and for tapping local groups to run residential facilities or group homes.

The state announced in March the largest single expansion of community-based care since the model was first adopted in 2017. DFPS this year signed contracts with third parties in three DFPS districts, representing nearly 50 counties in the Piney Woods, Deep East Texas and North Texas. Before then, community-based care was operating in just four DFPS districts, representing Tarrant County and six nearby counties, 30 counties around Abilene, 41 counties in the Panhandle, and 27 counties surrounding San Antonio.

DFPS Commissioner Stephanie Muth told lawmakers at a February Senate Finance Committee hearing that the agency will likely require fewer in-house caseworkers. Instead, Muth said the agency will need to focus more on managing contracts and less on staffers managing cases.

Lawmakers could increase the amount the state pays operators of facilities that house and provide services for foster care kids.

For each day of care, DFPS currently pays those providers a rate that is based on the child’s needs. There are five “levels of care”: basic, moderate, specialized, intense and intense plus. The majority of foster care children fall under the basic and moderate levels of care. But when a child has more complex needs — such as intensive mental health services for those at risk of hospitalization and support for older youth about to age out of care — the state pays the provider a higher rate.

A consulting group hired by the state found current foster care rates are based on data that is more than a decade old and that the rates do not “realistically reflect staff time and effort associated with providing care.” Without adequate funds, providers are limited in the resources they can offer to foster care kids.

The House and Senate have earmarked $100 million over two years to increase rates. A large part of the $100 million is slated for providers working with higher-needs kids; the Legislature approved to increase rates for those providers in 2021 to alleviate the placement crisis.

Child welfare experts, along with the agency, have recommended moving away from tying rates to children and their “levels of care.”

“The needs of children fluctuate, which means payments can fluctuate,” Jamie McCormick, vice president of public affairs at the Texas Alliance of Child and Family Services, wrote in a statement. “This fluctuation creates fiscal instability. Worse, the leveling system can disrupt treatment for the child or limit their ability to sustain progress.”

They’re instead proposing a new system that would identify different services a child needs, and rates would be tied to those services.